Oh thank you, well I suspect there's no disagreement at all. I don't know that the Bible presumes to do non-fiction reportage on the deity. I suspect the scriptures may offer themselves as a kind of cosmic theater production for the worshipper to attend for amusement and edification, in which God is sometimes viewed in a human form for the purpose of the 'play'.

The theological point that should be firm, in my view, is that the human body is seen as a divine structure. Being created in the divine 'image' seems to mean a resemblance between the body of God and the human body. Now how that works out—is anybody's guess. We might note Jesus' very unusual and unexpected discussion in Matthew 15:17-18 of the human body but he seems not to be discussing a physical process exactly. So there's--spiritual anatomy in biblical spirituality?

As the Yahweh of the OT is subtly telegraphed to be the color blue (as in the sky or ocean) I have really wondered if Hindu iconography of deities is so very removed. Here is a discussion of the use of images and icons of deities in Hindu thought.

https://www.bl.uk/sacred-texts/articles/the-hindu-sacred-image-and-its-iconography#

Vajra asks that if Vishnu, as God, exists everywhere, then what’s the point of making images of him and summoning Him to reside in the image? Mārkaṇḍeya replies that in his highest personal mode of existence, Vishnu is unbounded, having neither beginning, nor middle, nor end. However, out of love (anugraha) for the devotee and to be more approachable to the worshipper, Vishnu presents himself in the image, which is a ‘condensed’ (piṇḍita) form of his, and has a beginning, a middle and an end. So the image is no more than a way for Vishnu to make Himself accessible to the worshipper. In more general terms, it is also a way for the Deity, transcendent and mighty in its own right, to graciously don the mantle of humility so that It can be approached at an earthly level without overawing the devotee.